ОП рожден шлюхой и членодевкой
Автор статьи черножопый фашист сука, а ты куда с коммизначком лезешь?
Неприятно, либерахен?
Да-да, давай называть антифашистов фашистами потому что они обличают структурный белый расизм.
Совок был построен на красном терроре
Против буржуев, да. И это охуенно.
Против народа, а не против буржуев.
Когда-нибудь эти пидоры заплатят репарации
So all sections of white settler society — even the artisan, worker, and farmer — were totally dependent upon Afrikan slave labor: the fisherman whose low-grade,"refuse fish" was dried and sold as slave meal in the Indies; the New York farmer who found his market for surpluses in the Southern plantations; the forester whose timber was used by shipyard workers rapidly turning out slave ships; the clerk in the New York City export house checking bales of tobacco awaiting shipment to London; the master cooper in the Boston rum distillery; the young Virginia overseer building up his "stake" to try and start his own plantation; the immigrant German farmer renting a team of five slaves to get his farm started; and on and on. While the cream of the profits went to the planter and merchant capitalists, the entire settler economy was raised up on a foundation of slave labor, slave products, and the slave trade.
Nor was it just slavery within the thirteen Colonies alone that was essential. The commerce and industry of these Euro-Amerikan settlers was interdependent with their fellow slave-owning capitalists of the West Indies, Central and Southern America. Massachusetts alone, in 1774, distilled 2.7 million gallons of rum-distilled from the molasses of the West Indies slave plantations.(22) Two of the largest industries in Amerika were shipbuilding and shipping, both creatures of the slave trade. Commerce with the slave colonies of not only England, but also Holland, Spain and France, was vital to the young Amerikan economy. Eric Williams, Walter Rodney and others have shown how European capitalism as a whole literally capitalized itself for industrialization and world empire out of Afrikan slavery. It is important to see that all classes of Euro-Amerikan settlers were equally involved in building a new bourgeois nation on the back of the Afrikan colonial proletariat.
By the time of the settler War of Independence, the Afrikan nation made up over 20% of the non-Indian population — one Afrikan colonial subject for every four settlers. Afrikan slaves, although heavily concentrated in the plantation Colonies, were still represented throughout the settler territories. Their proportion in the non-Indian population ranged from 2-3% in upper New England to 8% in Rhode Island, to 14% in New York, and to 41% and 60% respectively in Virginia and South Carolina.(23) While they mainly labored as the agricultural proletariat, Afrikan labor played a crucial role in all the major trades and industries of the times. The colonized Afrikan nation, much more than the new Euro-Amerikan settler nation, was a complete nation — that is, possessing among its people a complete range of applied sciences, practical crafts and productive labor. Both that colonized nation and the Indian nations were self-sufficient and economically whole, while the Euro-Amerikan invasion society was parasitic. While the class structure of the new Afrikan nation was still in a formative stage, distinct classes were visible within it well before the U.S. War of Independence.
In Virginia, it appears that an overwhelming majority of the skilled workers — carpenters, ship pilots, coopers, blacksmiths, etc. — were Afrikans. Nor was it just nonmarket production for direct use on the plantation; Afrikan artisans produced for the commercial market, and were often hired out by their masters. For example, we know that George Washington was not only a planter but also what would today be called a contractor — building structures for other planters with his gang of Afrikan slave carpenters (the profits were split between "The Father of Our Country" and his slave overseer).(24) The Afrikan presence in commerce and industry was widespread and all-pervasive, as one labor historian has summarized:
Some of the Africans who were brought to America in chains were skilled in woodcarving, weaving, construction, and other crafts. In the South, Black slaves were not only field hands; many developed a variety of skills that were needed on a nearly self-sufficient plantation. Because skilled labor of whatever color was in great demand, slaves were often hired out to masters who owned shops by the day, month, or year for a stipulated amount. Some were hired out to shipmasters, serving as pilots and managers of ferries. Others were used in the maritime trades as shipcaulkers, longshoremen, and sailmakers. A large number of slaves were employed in Northern cities as house servants, sailors, sailmakers, and carpenters. New York had a higher proportion of skilled slaves than any other Colony-coopers, tailors, bakers, tanners, goldsmiths, cabinetmakers, shoemakers, and glaziers. Both in Charleston and in the Northern cities, many artisans utilized slave labor extensively."(25)
Afrikans were the landless, propertyless, permanent workers of the U.S. Empire. They were not just slaves — the Afrikan nation as a whole served as a proletariat for the Euro-Amerikan oppressor nation. This Afrikan colony supported on its shoulders the building of a Euro-Amerikan society more "prosperous," more "egalitarian," and yes, more "democratic" than any in semi-feudal Old Europe. The Jeffersonian vision of Amerika as a pastoral European democracy was rooted in the national life of small, independent white landowners. Such a society had no place of a proletariat within its ranks — yet, in the age of capitalism, could not do without the labor of such a class. Amerika imported a proletariat from Afrika, a proletariat permanently chained in an internal colony, laboring for the benefit of all settlers. Afrikan workers might be individually owned, like tools and draft animals, by some settlers and not others, but in their colonial subjugation they were as a whole owned by the entire Euro-Amerikan nation.
>"Don't-Divide-The-Working-Class" revisionists, who want to convince us that the Euro-Amerikan masses are "victims of imperialism" just like us]
Т.е. справедливо обратное.
>1800
>America was dependent on slave labor
>4% were blacks at 1800
Я правильно понял, один негр кормил 25 янки? Интересно, а почему они сейчас даже себя прокормить с трудом могут?
>America was dependent on slave labor
>4% were blacks at 1800
Я правильно понял, один негр кормил 25 янки? Интересно, а почему они сейчас даже себя прокормить с трудом могут?
Да. Привилегированный белый рабочий против негра в тюрьме или мексиканца-нелегела, которого босс выдаст ICE'у если тот начнёт рыпаться.
https://wondergressive.com/private-prison-sues-state-wins-more-prisoners/
Зацени, плять:
A private prison in Arizona recently sued the state for having a lack of prisoners. For the sake of saving over $16 million in back pay, the state settled by paying the private prison $3 million. Arizona essentially payed a company $3 million because not enough people are committing crimes.
To be fair, it’s a bit more complex than that. In July, 2010 three violent inmates escaped from an Arizona private prison, which prompted officials to stop sending new inmates to the facility. I say good job to the officials for demanding better performance from Management & Training Corp., the company that runs the prison. Unfortunately, a line in the company’s contract with the state guarantees that the prison is at least 97% full at all times. They sued on grounds that the breach of contract caused a dramatic loss in revenue.
СССР построен на геноциде и рабстве, прув ми ронг, коммишваль
>Я правильно понял, один негр кормил 25 янки?
Нет, это значит, что негры дохли, как мухи, от такого труда, и на замену им завозили новых негров. Население Африки стагнировало с 1700 по 1900 годы на уровне 100 миллионов - вся эта масса населения, которая не прибавлялась к населению пока остальные континенты росли в населении, была уничтожена рабством. Примерно как Ирландия, только хуже.
Доказательства геноцида и рабства США на лицо, ты у нас требуешь доказать наоборот. Съебись
Ты белый, значит ты, в понимании автора статьи унтерменш, значит полезай в печь.
Если ты на полном серьезе игнорируешь миллионы доказательств геноцида русских и других народов при совке то ты феерический еблан.
Не неси хуйню. Не проецируй излияния своего немощного мозга на автора. Белые националисты вообще странные люди, они почему-то думают, что каждый раз когда негры говорят про угнетение и репарации это они так маскируются и хотят белых в рабство взять (проекции белых националистов).
Миллионы "доказательств", на проверку оказывающимися уткой от очередного Фалун Гонга с его сбором органов у живых уйгуров. Знаем мы ваши доказательства, фашист ты наш.
>построены на геноциде и рабстве
как любая другая страна, включая россеюшку. только мемерика ебала другие страны и народы, а русаки ебли в хвост и в гриву друг дружку.
То есть ты на полном сурьезе отрицаешь голодомор, принудительные переселения народов коренных и репрессии?
Я отрицаю трактовку от западных "специалистов" на зарплате ЦРУ. Советские архивы открыты, читай историков, пользуйся, но нет блядь, мы будем и дальше читать смесь из американских газетных баек из 20ых и реальную нацистскую пропаганду и рассказывать о жутких НКВДшниках, которые всех свидетелей расстреляли, все настоящие документы сожгли и прочее, прочее.
Съеби, фашист.
> Советские архивы открыты, читай историков, пользуйся
В которых куча пруфов расстрелов ни за что без суда и следсвтия, и прочей бесчеловечной хуйни??
Лол, этот тред - лишнее подтверждение тому, что коммипадаль = ненавистник белой расы. Поэтому никаких разговоров с коммипадалью быть не должно.
>без суда и следствия
>на картинках постановления после суда и следствия
Ебать ты брейнлет.
Обличаешь историю геноцида и рабовладения белыми == ненавистник белой расы. Окей, нацист.
На гербе Совка написано что? "Пролетарии всех стран, объединяйтесь!" Это тоже ревизионизм в твоем понимании?
ОП, а ты знаешь, что антисемитизм - это такое выражение антибуржуазного протеста?
Рабство это когда человек владеет человеком, а ниггерская обезьяна как известно человеком не является, поэтому в США не было рабства. Обоссал коммижидка-сатаниста
Ты будешь визжать как сучка в моём ООО "Анкап Суд". Специально для коммунистов у меня будет неопровержимое доказательство: "Яскозал ВЕНОВЕН". Ух, где ж я столько бабла хранить буду.
Я тебе рандом пиков вкинул, такие очевидные вещи даже ковырять смысла нет. Вопрос в том что как тройка дебсов может решать кого стрелять а кого нет.
Вы не только ненавистники белой расы, вы просто человеконенавистники
Кто о чем а коммижид о злых белых и (((правах))) ниггеров.
Что тут у нас, говносовок копротивляется за черный фашизм против белых людей?
Интересно
Какая была позиция СССР по отношению к Чёрным Пантерам?
Нет, антисемитизм - это выражение расизма. Как и в случае с неграми он служит гноблению людей таким образом, чтобы те работали за гроши. В случае с евреями выходило, что патриархи семейств получали возможность эксплуатировать свою родню за гроши и наживать состояния за счёт закрытой кастовости. Типа как старообрядцы. Заметь, что никакой системной опрессии богатых евреев нет, только к бедным евреям она есть.
Такие очевидные вещи, что ты их даже доказать не можешь, кек.
Обличать геноцид, сотворённый белыми людьми по отношению к индейцам и неграм, и рабство == чёрный фашизм против белых людей. Ебать вы промытые. Наверное, вас ещё и феминистки в играх ущемляют, да?
Доказательства силы притяжения тоже заставишь принести?
Когда вы повымираете уже? Я серьезно надеюсь что ты просто зеленый, пушто жить с такими поехавшими - пиздец
>Обличать геноцид
Ты так говоришь как будто американцы не покаялись и скрывают преступления колоний против коренных и рабство черных
>Ебать вы промытые
Нет, если бы ты не верещал про покаяться и выплату компенсаций всем было бы похуй
Так не было геноцида против индейцев и черных.
Индейцев и черных в африке и США до белой колонизации по современным оценкам жило что твоих чухонцев в лесах севера России. Некого геноцидить было.
>Ты так говоришь как будто американцы не покаялись и скрывают преступления колоний против коренных и рабство черных
Как будто бы американцы нация колонистов, имевшая колонии по всему миру, и теперь отвественная за колониальные проблемы.
Европейцы хорошо поработали, что все шишки теперь достаются клятой Америке, а настоящие колониальные империи 18-19го века, обирающие свои "бывшие" колонии через "виртуальные" договоренности как бы ни при чем.
>США построены на геноциде и рабстве
Как будто что то плохое.
>США построены на геноциде и рабстве
Мировая практика
Может они еще индейцев огненной водой не спаивали?
Всмысле можно не платить налоги в резервациях и делать бизнес?
>Yet Karl Marx observed: "Cause slavery to disappear and you will have wiped America off the map of nations."(15) Marx was writing during the zenith of the cotton economy of the mid-1800s, but this most basic fact is true from the bare beginnings of European settlement in Amerika.
OK mister Vasyan Chuhan Eban Blue. And why then Karl Marx being a relative of Rothschild took money from him paying for the capitalist system? Was he so sympathetic to the slaves?
Maybe Marx is just a scoundrel whose ideas were simply to overthrow the national elite, to destroy all structures in society, including the family, and with the help of the deceived proletariat to put in the place of the national elite of the jews, who will redistribute wealth in favor of the capitalists on another continent? Maybe that's why the first international was so generously paid for by western bankers, including Rothschild?
Черепомеры тоже говорят, что это как сила притяжения. Очень плохой аргумент с твоей стороны, как нацист выглядишь.
>Ты так говоришь как будто американцы не покаялись и скрывают преступления колоний против коренных и рабство черных
Нет, не покаялись. Да, скрывают. До сих пор живёт миф о пустой земле, на которую приплыли беженцы из Европы. До сих пор не выплатили компенсации. До сих пор негров отделяют от права голоса. До сих пор полиция расстреливает негров.
В Африке в 1800ых годах жило 90 миллионов человек.
http://www.thuto.org/ubh/ub/h202/wpop1.htm
Конечно европейцы виноваты в колониализме. Но это не повод сбрасывать вину с американцев.
Спаивали. И с родных земель в пустыню выгнали. А теперь ещё и из пустынь выгоняют потому что нефтепровод где-то же надо прокладывать.
>цитата анархиста-антисемита Бакунина
Анархисты такие анархисты.
Как понять что комми открыл рот? Он начал врать.
Индейский геноцид теперь называют инедйской демографической катастрофой. Статистика за весь 20й век интересные кренделя выписывают: в начале века считалось что клятые американцы и испанцы уработали 90% населения америк, потом что половину, теперь вот что 10-20%.
Хотя понятно что демографические сведения о жителях доцивилизованных областей это чистая спекуляция: люди в естественных условиях живут как упомянутые выше аборигены русского севера, т.е. на всю Северную Америку к 1600му году был дай бог миллион человек.
Бурный рост индийского населения пошел в 1700х, когда индейцы наладили плотный обмен с колонистами, и смогли жировать в полуоседлых условиях. Это закончилось бобровыми войнами, империей команчи, и прочими виртуальными общинами поднявшихся и расплодившихся индейцев, которых уже колонисты по-настоящему смели.
Американцы были чудовищно глупы и неопытны, поэтому все их провалы национальной политики (см. 5 цивилизованных племен и дорога слез) в европе высмеивались, выставлялись признаком слабости и идиотизма, тогда как теже англичане свои голдоморы выдавали за чуть ли не победы своей мудрой политики. Вот и расхелбывают до сих пор
>До сих пор не выплатили компенсации
Схуяли их выплачивать должны дальним потомкам которые даже не страдали?
Вся суть комискотины, нахаляву бабла урвать, и похуй что все за счет честных белых
>В Африке в 1800ых годах жило 90 миллионов человек.
Ох ты господи, когда колонизация африки началась? До колонизации это дикие области, где копошатся банту на юге, нигерийцы в дельте нигера и миллионы арабов осваивают магреб на севере.
И неси детализацию по странам, сам поймешь что к чему.
That's not the answer commieretard. But since you're talking about anti-semitism...
1) Маняграфик современных вученых, пытающийся как-то оправдать расистскую чепуху про то что европейцы кого-то там умучили
2) Реальный график голубеньким, банальная аппроксимация+учет того что африка на 90% не жилая без технологий уровня 19го века
2) Реальный график голубеньким, банальная аппроксимация+учет того что африка на 90% не жилая без технологий уровня 19го века
Почему русские приписывают себя к белым? Русские не белые и не должны брать на себя вину белых или защищать белых. Вас самих из рабства только при совке выпустили. Что о русских думают европейцы итак давно известно. Прекращайте это раболепие и поиск барина. Русские не белые.
And what kind of antisemitism can we talk about when Marx wrote - To the Jewish question in 1844?
> про то что европейцы кого-то там умучили
Не было такого?
Answer questions retard
>Может они еще индейцев огненной водой не спаивали?
Нет конечно, как и совочки не спаивали агрессивных чукчей.
>как нацист выглядишь.
Как что то плохое
Может еще и ирландцы не белые? Ведь ирландцев тоже держали в рабстве.
Не пизди, блядь. От 2 до 7 миллионов до Колумба. У них были города и пирамиды уровня Древнего Египта, на такую хуйню нужны как раз 2-7 миллионов человек. Северные индейцы не только оказали огромнейшее влияние на политическое устройство США (caucus индейское слово, например), но и знали медь и занимались земледелием. А потом пришли европейцы и частично поработили, частично прогнали их в ебеня, к которым индейцы не были приспособлены.
До колонизации эти области продавали европейцам сначала одежду, золото и прочие вещи, затем рабов 200 лет. Эти нации были достаточно прочны чтобы защищаться от европейцев до изобретения пулемётов, плять. Негры ходили с ружьями, купленными у европейцев, и тому тонны исторических свидетельств. Негры раньше европейцев научились работать с железом нахуй, в Зимбабве строили охуительнейшие города, Манса Муса ломал инфляцией рынок Европы. Но нет, конечно же европейцы на ПУСТУЮ ЗЕМЛЮ пришли, они же хорошие и добрые, не могли же они ради профита устраивать рабство и геноцид.
>учёные врут
Какой к чертям антисемитизм Маркса? Возьми да почитай статью, это ответ к статье Бауэра, где тот рассказывал, что евреям свобода в Германии не нужна до тех пор, пока евреи не "эволюционируют" в христиан. На что Маркс ответил, что еврейство и христианство функционально одинаковые и раз евреи злые и плохие, то и христиане не лучше.
Очень плохое.
>Заметь, что никакой системной опрессии богатых евреев нет, только к бедным евреям она есть.
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Погром
Не белые. В глазах европейцев. Бедные - ирландцы, португальцы, южные итальянцы, греки, турки - всегда не белые.
Fucking communist coward ran away from answering the questions.
Нет никакого единства белых. Белые убивали белых. Белые англичане презирают белых ирландцев и всю остальную Европу.
Именно, бедных евреев гнобили, богатых холили и лелеяли.
Тяжело умучить тех, кого нет. Конечно же европейцы установили в колониях коммунизм (т.е. работа за еду, побои, 0 культуры), торговали людишками, выкачивали ресурсы. Но одно дело, когда это делается поверх развитой страны и культуры, другое дело когда поверх пустых джунглей, где люди представлены россыпью племен.
И в основном, конечно же, негры мучали сами себя - например, они ловили и продавали своих соотечественников (самим европейцам этим заниматься было не с руки), а банту, перенявшие у европейцев ноухау земледелия просто уничтожили все другие черные подрасы на юге африки за 500 лет подсечно огневого земледелия.
>а банту, перенявшие у европейцев ноухау земледелия
О да, ноухау земледелия европейцев, которые к хуям плодоносный слой почвы снесли, на котором негры до них столетиями жили и выращивали рис и пшеницу.
>От 2 до 7 миллионов до Колумба.
Это ты примерно так прочуствовал?
То ли дело быть совочком
>продавали европейцам сначала одежду, золото и прочие вещи, затем рабов 200 лет
>европейцы на ПУСТУЮ ЗЕМЛЮ пришли, они же хорошие и добрые, не могли же они ради профита устраивать рабство и геноцид.
Во дела, негры то сами негров в рабство продавали, а каяться только белые должны
> От 2 до 7 миллионов до Колумба. У них были города и пирамиды уровня Древнего Египта, на такую хуйню нужны как раз 2-7 миллионов человек. Северные индейцы не только оказали огромнейшее влияние на политическое устройство США (caucus индейское слово, например), но и знали медь и занимались земледелием. А потом пришли европейцы и частично поработили, частично прогнали их в ебеня, к которым индейцы не были приспособлены.
Ну вот геноцид 2х миллионов до 500 000 это одно, 7 миллионов до 500 000 это другое, а 90-100 миллионов - третье. А если не 2 миллиона, а миллион, или может, кхм-кхм, полмиллиона?
>знали медь
Шахт только не было, а так знали, да. Риторика про умученных индецев это реалии 19го века, когда индейцев натравливали все кому не лень на американскую вольницу.
>Эти нации были достаточно прочны чтобы защищаться от европейцев до изобретения пулемётов, плять. Негры ходили с ружьями, купленными у европейцев, и тому тонны исторических свидетельств.
Записываем: до разрушения колониальных империй негры воевали друг против друга с ружьями, которые покупали у европейцев и вообще находились у европейцев под полным контролем из-за технологического превохсодства. После крушения колониальных империй негры стреляют друг друга из пулемета.
>Негры раньше европейцев научились работать с железом нахуй, в Зимбабве строили охуительнейшие города, Манса Муса ломал инфляцией рынок Европы.
Меньше внимания уделяйте мифологии, и больше - истории европы 18-21го века, откроются миры.
>они же хорошие и добрые
Нет, они злые. Просто эта злость естественна и логична, а не азиатская жестокость ради жестокости. Также как естественно и логично рабство.
>учёные врут
Нет, ты просто не знаешь что на самом деле говорят ученые, т.к. не принадлежишь к академическому сословию (в отличие от меня, хы-хы).
Нет, так говорит википедия.
То ли дело нацистскую пропаганду повторять.
Белые покупают только рабов - виноваты только негры.
Заметь, что государства Африки неоднократно противились такому, но были вынуждены из-за торговой блокады.
Абсолютно без разницы - факт в том, что в результате культурного обмена с португальцами банту перестали кучковаться в районе великих озер, расплодились и снесли половину африки в единой миграционной волне. Банту заслуживают уважухи, почти европейцы.
>но были вынуждены из-за торговой блокады
Кулстори.
Это реальность, перемололи белых людей совки и теперь только из новиопов состоите
Мы живем в интересное время - заканчивается гегемон америки, наступает гегемон ЕС и условных стран Азии (т.е. КНР и Индии, у правляемых насквозь коррумпированными международными шайками).
В этом новом мире будет новая легенда:
1) Все культуры одинаково равны
2) Каждая деревня, построенная в 1980х - на самом деле имеет многотысячелетнюю историю
3) Не надо ехать жить в Париж или Берлин, ведь у тебя тут так интересно, духовно, здорово, изучай кубик-рубика местной филологии и истории, это же так поучительно
4) Не мешайся под ногами.
Вот под эту мифологию подбивается вообще все, под атомизаци. и увелечение количества культур. Игра рискованная (т.к. государства и культуры естественно стремятся к экспансии и укрупнению), но те, у кого в руках окажутся ключики от национальных мифов будут королями ближайшие несколько веков.
В этом новом мире будет новая легенда:
1) Все культуры одинаково равны
2) Каждая деревня, построенная в 1980х - на самом деле имеет многотысячелетнюю историю
3) Не надо ехать жить в Париж или Берлин, ведь у тебя тут так интересно, духовно, здорово, изучай кубик-рубика местной филологии и истории, это же так поучительно
4) Не мешайся под ногами.
Вот под эту мифологию подбивается вообще все, под атомизаци. и увелечение количества культур. Игра рискованная (т.к. государства и культуры естественно стремятся к экспансии и укрупнению), но те, у кого в руках окажутся ключики от национальных мифов будут королями ближайшие несколько веков.
Marx not only calls jewry a chimerical nationality, but he writes there that " money is the jealous God of Israel, before whom there must be no other God." It's in his book. It's antisemitism, even by the old standards.
Answer on this questions fucking retard
Anyway, you're a lying coward like all communists. Fuck you red scam.
>Каждая деревня, построенная в 1980х - на самом деле имеет многотысячелетнюю историю
Куполошизик, ты!?
Не знаю кто таков.
Лучше запощу фентезийные картинки из китайского подводного города.
Или запрещенные к раскопкам гробницы императоров Японии.
Создание себе фентези-истории на ровном месте - это естественный процесс, им все занимаются. В 21м веке это будет просто максимально развитый тренд, у людей резьбу сорвет на придумывание сеттингов для каждой африканской параши.
Не было никакого геноцида, рабам просто перекрыли финансирование
Если бы ты читал внимательно, то заметил бы:
Let us consider the actual, worldly Jew – not the Sabbath Jew, as Bauer does, but the everyday Jew.
Let us not look for the secret of the Jew in his religion, but let us look for the secret of his religion in the real Jew.
What is the secular basis of Judaism? Practical need, self-interest. What is the worldly religion of the Jew? Huckstering. What is his worldly God? Money.
Very well then! Emancipation from huckstering and money, consequently from practical, real Judaism, would be the self-emancipation of our time.
Т.е. "посмотрим же не на выдуманного еврея, а еврея реального, ежедневного", и в конце Маркс заключает:
Christianity sprang from Judaism. It has merged again in Judaism.
From the outset, the Christian was the theorizing Jew, the Jew is, therefore, the practical Christian, and the practical Christian has become a Jew again.
Christianity had only in semblance overcome real Judaism. It was too noble-minded, too spiritualistic to eliminate the crudity of practical need in any other way than by elevation to the skies.
Christianity is the sublime thought of Judaism, Judaism is the common practical application of Christianity, but this application could only become general after Christianity as a developed religion had completed theoretically the estrangement of man from himself and from nature.
Only then could Judaism achieve universal dominance and make alienated man and alienated nature into alienable, vendible objects subjected to the slavery of egoistic need and to trading.
Как я и сказал. Его критика "евреев" всего лишь риторический приём чтобы показать, что христиане нихуя не лучше, они ровно такие же.
Европейцы покупают только рабов @ нужен импорт оружия и товаров. Да-да, торговля никак не повлияла. Колонии европейцев (даже современных лузеров-датчан) по всему побережью Западной Африки, золотой берег, рабский берег, берег слоновой кости, всё это говно стояло в Африке с 1500ых годов. Но да, европейцы приплыли туда просто так, ага, на пустое место, не смотря на то, что, например, африканское золото дало название британской монеты в 1663 году. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guinea_(coin) Ага, пустая Африка.
Дружок, имя британской монеты происходит от названия Генуи, а не от названия небританской колонии. Нельзя же быть таким необразованным варваром.
Заселение первобытных областей, прогрессорство среди нецивилизованного населения - отличная плата за рабство и колониализм.
>даже современных лузеров-датчан
>лузеров
>The guinea was a coin of approximately one quarter ounce of gold that was minted in Great Britain between 1663 and 1814.[1] The name came from the Guinea region in West Africa, where much of the gold used to make the coins originated.[2]
>а не от названия небританской колонии
Золото получили в Гвинее. К чему тут чья колония, брейнлет?
>отвечает про ВВП на строчку про задворки мировой политики
Ебать дебил.
>Заселение первобытных областей, прогрессорство среди нецивилизованного населения
Не было первобытных областей, еблан. Где первобытные области были европейцы не селились. Приплывали туда, где были деньги, где было население, производящее товары, которые можно продать. Это, блядь, логика капитализма. Вас, дебилов, послушать, так европейцы в убыток себе империи строили чтобы хуями помериться. А потом вы ещё что-то про человеческую природу и эгоизм говорите.
Короче, колониализм в стиле 19 века это или тупо военная оккупация, как Индия и Ближний Восток, или заселение малонаселенных территорий, как Австралия и Америка. Африка это дейсвтительно нечто среднее, я не очень хорошо представляю себе тамошние отношения и куда ее отнести.
Америка, Канада, Южная Африка и Австралия - это заселение земли, очищенной от местных. Переселялись главным образом дети малоземельных землевладельцев, которым грозила участь рабочего быдла. Они бежали в Новый Свет за землёй как символом статуса. Когда земли снова становилось мало, они нападали на местных и снова получали пустую землю, которую покупали за бесценок. А, заодно, и рабов, чтобы эту землю обрабатывать. В Индии и Африке такой хуйни не было потому, что местные аборигены были достаточно развиты и имели какую-никакую промышленность; это были дисциплинированные работники, которые умели трудиться в феодальных и капиталистических условиях. Индейцы просто дохли в шахтах и противились, негры дохли в шахтах, приносили доход и будучи на чужой земле за океаном противились слабо. Только когда европейцы заполучили свою мощную промышленность европейцы смогли уничтожить африканскую и индийскую на корню, а так как корень богатства Африки и Индии не землевладение, а текстиль/золото/специи, то и местное население европейцам очень было нужно.
The British, short of troops and laborers, decided to use both the Indian nations and the Afrikan slaves to help bring down the settler rebels. This was nothing unique; the French had extensively used Indian military alliances and the British extensively used Afrikan slave recruits in their 1756-63 war over North America (called "The French & Indian War" in settler history books). But the Euro-Amerikan settlers, sitting on the dynamite of a restive, nationally oppressed Afrikan population, were terrified втВмтАЭ and outraged.
This was the final proof to many settlers of King George III's evil tyranny. An English gentlewoman traveling in the Colonies wrote that popular settler indignation was so great that it stood to unite rebels and Tories again. (15) Tom Paine, in his revolutionary pamphlet Common Sense, raged against "...that barbarous and hellish power which hath stirred up Indians and Negroes to destroy us." (16) But oppressed peoples saw this war as a wonderful contradiction to be exploited in the ranks of the European capitalists.
Lord Dunmore was Royal Governor of Virginia in name, but ruler over so little that he had to reside aboard a British warship anchored offshore. Urgently needing reinforcements for his outnumbered command, on Nov. 5, 1775 he issued a proclamation that any slaves enlisting in his forces would be freed. Sir Henry Clinton, commander of British forces in North America, later issued an even broader offer:
I do most strictly forbid any Person to sell or claim Right over any Negroe, the property of a Rebel, who may claim refuge in any part of this Army; And I do promise to every Negroe who shall desert the Rebel Standard, full security to follow within these Lines, any Occupation which he shall think proper. (17)
Could any horn have called more clearly? By the thousands upon thousands, Afrikans struggled to reach British lines. One historian of the Exodus has said: "The British move was countered by the Americans, who exercised closer vigilance over their slaves, removed the able-bodied to interior places far from the scene of the war, and threatened with dire punishment all who sought to join the enemy. To Negroes attempting to flee to the British the alternatives 'Liberty or Death' took on an almost literal meaning. Nevertheless, by land and sea they made their way to the British forces." (18)
The war was a disruption to Slave Amerika, a chaotic gap in the European capitalist ranks to be hit hard. Afrikans seized the time втВмтАЭ not by the tens or hundreds, but by the many thousands. Amerika shook with the tremors of their movement. The signers of the Declaration of Independence were bitter about their personal losses: Thomas Jefferson lost many of his slaves; Virginia's Governor Benjamin Harrison lost thirty of "my finest slaves"; William Lee lost sixty-five slaves, and said two of his neighbors "lost every slave they had in the world"; South Carolina's Arthur Middleton lost fifty slaves. (19)
Afrikans were writing their own "Declaration of Independence" by escaping. Many settler patriots tried to appeal to the British forces to exercise European solidarity and expel the Rebel slaves. George Washington had to denounce his own brother for bringing food to the British troops, in a vain effort to coax them into returning the Washington family slaves. (20) Yes, the settler patriots were definitely upset to see some real freedom get loosed upon the land.
To this day no one really knows how many slaves freed themselves during the war. Georgia settlers were said to have lost over 10,000 slaves, while the number of Afrikan escaped prisoners in South Carolina and Virginia was thought to total well over 50,000. Many, in the disruption of war, passed themselves off as freemen and relocated in other territories, fled to British Florida and Canada, or took refuge in Maroon communities or with the Indian nations. It has been estimated that 100,000 Afrikan prisoners втВмтАЭ some 20% of the slave population втВмтАЭ freed themselves during the war. (21)
The thousands of rebellious Afrikans sustained the British war machinery. After all, if the price of refuge from the slavemaster was helping the British throw down the settlers, it was not such a distasteful task. Lord Dunmore had an "Ethiopian Regiment" of ex-slaves (who went into battle with the motto "Liberty to Slaves" sewn on their jackets) who helped the British capture and burn Norfolk, Va. on New Years Day, 1776. (22) That must have been sweet, indeed. Everywhere, Afrikans appeared with the British units as soldiers, porters, road-builders, guides and intelligence agents. Washington declared that unless the slave escapes could be halted the British Army would inexorably grow "like a snowball in rolling". (23)
It was only under this threat втВмтАЭ not only of defeat, but defeat in part by masses of armed ex-slaves втВмтАЭ that the settlers hurriedly reversed their gears and started recruiting Afrikans into the Continental U.S. Army. The whole contradiction of arming slaves and asking them to defend their slavemasters was apparent to many. Fearing this disruption of the concentration camp culture of the plantations втВмтАЭ and fearing even more the dangers of arming masses of Afrikans втВмтАЭ many settlers preferred to lose to their British kith and kin rather than tamper with slavery. But that choice was no longer fully theirs to make, as the genie was part-way out of the bottle.
On Dec. 31, 1775, Gen. Washington ordered the enlistment of Afrikans into the Continental Army, with the promise of freedom at the end of the war. Many settlers sent their slaves into the army to take their place. One Hessian mercenary officer with the British said: "The Negro can take the field instead of the master; and therefore, no regiment is to be seen in which there are not Negroes in abundance..." Over 5,000 Afrikans served in the Patriot military, making up a large proportion of the most experienced troops (settlers usually served for only short enlistments втВмтАЭ 90 days duty being the most common term втВмтАЭ while slaves served until the war's end or death). (24)
For oppressed peoples the price of the war was paid in blood. Afrikan casualties were heavy (one-half of the Afrikans who served with the British in Virginia died in an epidemic). (25) And the Indian nations allied to the Crown suffered greatly as the tide of battle turned against their side. The same was true of many Afrikans captured in British defeats. Some were sold to the West Indies and others were executed. A similar heavy fate fell on those recaptured while making their way to British lines. The settler mass community organizations, such as the infamous "Committees of Correspondence" in New York and Massachusetts, played the same role up North that the Slave Patrols played in the South, of checking and arresting rebellious Afrikans. (26)
This was the final proof to many settlers of King George III's evil tyranny. An English gentlewoman traveling in the Colonies wrote that popular settler indignation was so great that it stood to unite rebels and Tories again. (15) Tom Paine, in his revolutionary pamphlet Common Sense, raged against "...that barbarous and hellish power which hath stirred up Indians and Negroes to destroy us." (16) But oppressed peoples saw this war as a wonderful contradiction to be exploited in the ranks of the European capitalists.
Lord Dunmore was Royal Governor of Virginia in name, but ruler over so little that he had to reside aboard a British warship anchored offshore. Urgently needing reinforcements for his outnumbered command, on Nov. 5, 1775 he issued a proclamation that any slaves enlisting in his forces would be freed. Sir Henry Clinton, commander of British forces in North America, later issued an even broader offer:
I do most strictly forbid any Person to sell or claim Right over any Negroe, the property of a Rebel, who may claim refuge in any part of this Army; And I do promise to every Negroe who shall desert the Rebel Standard, full security to follow within these Lines, any Occupation which he shall think proper. (17)
Could any horn have called more clearly? By the thousands upon thousands, Afrikans struggled to reach British lines. One historian of the Exodus has said: "The British move was countered by the Americans, who exercised closer vigilance over their slaves, removed the able-bodied to interior places far from the scene of the war, and threatened with dire punishment all who sought to join the enemy. To Negroes attempting to flee to the British the alternatives 'Liberty or Death' took on an almost literal meaning. Nevertheless, by land and sea they made their way to the British forces." (18)
The war was a disruption to Slave Amerika, a chaotic gap in the European capitalist ranks to be hit hard. Afrikans seized the time втВмтАЭ not by the tens or hundreds, but by the many thousands. Amerika shook with the tremors of their movement. The signers of the Declaration of Independence were bitter about their personal losses: Thomas Jefferson lost many of his slaves; Virginia's Governor Benjamin Harrison lost thirty of "my finest slaves"; William Lee lost sixty-five slaves, and said two of his neighbors "lost every slave they had in the world"; South Carolina's Arthur Middleton lost fifty slaves. (19)
Afrikans were writing their own "Declaration of Independence" by escaping. Many settler patriots tried to appeal to the British forces to exercise European solidarity and expel the Rebel slaves. George Washington had to denounce his own brother for bringing food to the British troops, in a vain effort to coax them into returning the Washington family slaves. (20) Yes, the settler patriots were definitely upset to see some real freedom get loosed upon the land.
To this day no one really knows how many slaves freed themselves during the war. Georgia settlers were said to have lost over 10,000 slaves, while the number of Afrikan escaped prisoners in South Carolina and Virginia was thought to total well over 50,000. Many, in the disruption of war, passed themselves off as freemen and relocated in other territories, fled to British Florida and Canada, or took refuge in Maroon communities or with the Indian nations. It has been estimated that 100,000 Afrikan prisoners втВмтАЭ some 20% of the slave population втВмтАЭ freed themselves during the war. (21)
The thousands of rebellious Afrikans sustained the British war machinery. After all, if the price of refuge from the slavemaster was helping the British throw down the settlers, it was not such a distasteful task. Lord Dunmore had an "Ethiopian Regiment" of ex-slaves (who went into battle with the motto "Liberty to Slaves" sewn on their jackets) who helped the British capture and burn Norfolk, Va. on New Years Day, 1776. (22) That must have been sweet, indeed. Everywhere, Afrikans appeared with the British units as soldiers, porters, road-builders, guides and intelligence agents. Washington declared that unless the slave escapes could be halted the British Army would inexorably grow "like a snowball in rolling". (23)
It was only under this threat втВмтАЭ not only of defeat, but defeat in part by masses of armed ex-slaves втВмтАЭ that the settlers hurriedly reversed their gears and started recruiting Afrikans into the Continental U.S. Army. The whole contradiction of arming slaves and asking them to defend their slavemasters was apparent to many. Fearing this disruption of the concentration camp culture of the plantations втВмтАЭ and fearing even more the dangers of arming masses of Afrikans втВмтАЭ many settlers preferred to lose to their British kith and kin rather than tamper with slavery. But that choice was no longer fully theirs to make, as the genie was part-way out of the bottle.
On Dec. 31, 1775, Gen. Washington ordered the enlistment of Afrikans into the Continental Army, with the promise of freedom at the end of the war. Many settlers sent their slaves into the army to take their place. One Hessian mercenary officer with the British said: "The Negro can take the field instead of the master; and therefore, no regiment is to be seen in which there are not Negroes in abundance..." Over 5,000 Afrikans served in the Patriot military, making up a large proportion of the most experienced troops (settlers usually served for only short enlistments втВмтАЭ 90 days duty being the most common term втВмтАЭ while slaves served until the war's end or death). (24)
For oppressed peoples the price of the war was paid in blood. Afrikan casualties were heavy (one-half of the Afrikans who served with the British in Virginia died in an epidemic). (25) And the Indian nations allied to the Crown suffered greatly as the tide of battle turned against their side. The same was true of many Afrikans captured in British defeats. Some were sold to the West Indies and others were executed. A similar heavy fate fell on those recaptured while making their way to British lines. The settler mass community organizations, such as the infamous "Committees of Correspondence" in New York and Massachusetts, played the same role up North that the Slave Patrols played in the South, of checking and arresting rebellious Afrikans. (26)
Назови здания в США, построенные неграми-рабами.
Все здания в США построены с помощью рабства.
Even those who had allied with the victorious settlers did not necessarily find themselves winning anything. Many Afrikans were disarmed and put back into chains at the war's end, despite solemn settler promises. John Hancock, President of the Continental Congress, may have presented Afrikan U.S. troops with a banner втВмтАЭ which praised them as "The Bucks of America" втВмтАЭ but that didn't help Afrikans such as Captain Mark Starlin. He was the first Afrikan captain in the Amerikan naval forces, and had won many honors for his near-suicidal night raids on the British fleet (which is why the settlers let him and his all-Afrikan crew sail alone). But as soon as the war ended, his master simply reclaimed him. Starlin spent the rest of his life as a slave. He, ironically enough, is known to historians as an exceptionally dedicated "patriot", superloyal to the new settler nation. (27)
What was primary for the Afrikan masses was a strategic relationship with the British Empire against settler Amerika. To use an Old European power against the Euro-Amerikan settlers втВмтАЭ who were the nearest and most immediate enemy втВмтАЭ was just common sense to many. 65,000 Afrikans joined the British forces втВмтАЭ over ten for every one enlisted in the Continental U.S. ranks. (28) As Lenin said in discussing the national question: "The masses vote with their feet". And in this case they voted against Amerika.
Secondarily, on an individual level Afrikans served with various forces in return for release from slavery. There was no real "political unity" or larger allegiance involved, just a quid pro quo. On the European sides as well, obviously. If the British and Patriot sides could have pursued their conflict without freeing any slaves or disrupting the slave system, they each gladly would have done so. Just as the slave enlistments in Bacon's Rebellion demonstrated only the temporary and tactical nature of alliances between oppressed and oppressor forces, so the alignment of forces in the settler War of Independence only proved that the national patriotic struggle of Euro-Amerikans was opposite to the basic interests and political desires of the oppressed.
Even in the ruins of British defeat, the soundness of this viewpoint was borne out in practice. While the jubilant Patriots watched the defeated British army evacuate New York City in 1783, some 4,000 Afrikans swarmed aboard the departing ships to escape Amerika. Another 4,000 Afrikans escaped with the British from Savannah, 6,000 from Charleston, and 5,000 escaped aboard British ships prior to the surrender. (29) Did these brothers and sisters "lose" the war втВмтАЭ compared to those still in chains on the plantations?
Others chose neither to leave nor submit. All during the war Indian and Afrikan guerrillas struck at the settlers. In one case, three hundred Afrikan ex-slaves fought an extended guerrilla campaign against the planters in both Georgia and South Carolina. Originally allied to the British forces, they continued their independent campaign long after the British defeat. They were not overcome until 1786, when their secret fort at Bear Creek was discovered and overwhelmed. This was but one front in the true democratic struggle against Amerika.
Jefferson's agile mind came up with a theoretical solution to their "Negro problem" - gradual genocide. He estimated that returning all slaves to Afrika would cost Amerika $900 million in lost capital and transportation expenses - a sum 45 times the annual export earnings of the settler economy at the time! This was an impossible cost, one that would have bankrupted not only the planters but the entire settler society as well.
President Jefferson's solution to this dilemma was to take all Afrikan children away from their parents for compact shipment to the West Indies and Afrika, while keeping the adults enslaved to support the Amerikan economy for the rest of their lives.* This would theoretically generate the necessary profits to prop up the capitalist economy, while still moving towards an all-white Amerika. Jefferson mused: "...the old stock would die off in the ordinary course of nature ... until its final disappearance." The President thought this Hitlerian fantasy both "practicable" and "blessed.""
It is easy to understand why this fantastic plan never became reality: the oppressor will never willingly remove his claws from the oppressed so long as there are still more profits to be wrung from them. Jefferson himself actively bought more and more slaves to maintain his pseudo-Grecian lifestyle. As President he signed the 1808 bill allegedly banning the importation of new slaves in part, we suspect, because this only raised the price he could obtain from his slave-breeding business.
Jefferson gloated over the increase in his wealth from the birth of new slaves: "... I consider the labor of a breeding woman as no object, and that a child raised every two years is of more profit than the crop of the best laboring man." It sums matters up to note that President Jefferson, who believed that the planters should restrict and then wipe out entirely the Afrikan colony, ended his days owning more slaves than he started with. (4)
The Northern States had slowly begun abolishing slavery as early as Vermont in 1777, in the hopes that the numbers of Afrikans could be kept down. It was also widely believed by settlers that in small numbers the "child-like" ex-slaves could be kept docile and easily ruled. The explosive growth of the number of Afrikans held prisoner within the slave system, and the resultant eruptions of Afrikan struggles in all spheres of life, blew this settler illusion away.
The Haitian Revolution of 1791 marked a decisive point in the politics of both settler and slave. The news from Santo Domingo that Afrikan prisoners had risen and successfully set up a new nation electrified the entire Western Hemisphere. When it became undeniably true that Afrikan people's armies, under the leadership of a 50-yearold former field hand, had in protracted war out-maneuvered and out-fought the professional armies of the Old European Powers, the relevancy of the lesson to Amerika was intense. Intense.
>President Jefferson's solution to this dilemma was to take all Afrikan children away from their parents for compact shipment to the West Indies and Afrika, while keeping the adults enslaved to support the Amerikan economy for the rest of their lives.
>President Jefferson's solution
Ёбаный пиздец.
Да похуй на геноцид и рабство, у них домики красивые.
The settlers were particularly upset that the Indian nations of the Old Southwest showed no signs of collapsing, "dying out" or trading away their land. All had developed stable and effective agricultural economies, with considerable trade. Euro-Amerikans, if anything, thought that they were too successful. The Cherokee, who had chosen a path of adopting many Western societal forms, had a national life more stable and prosperous than that of the Euro-Amerikan settlers who eventually occupied those Appalachian regions after they were forced out. A Presbyterian Church report in 1826 records that the Cherokee nation had: 7,600 houses, 762 looms, 1488 spinning wheels, 10 sawmills, 31 grain mills, 62 blacksmith shops, 18 schools, 70,000 head of livestock, a weekly newspaper in their own language, and numerous libraries with "thousands of good books". The Cherokee national government had a two-house legislature and a supreme court.(10)
Under the leadership of President Jackson, the U.S. Government ended even its limited recognition of Indian sovereignty, and openly encouraged land speculators and local settlers to start seizing Indian land at gunpoint. A U.S. Supreme Court ruling upholding Cherokee sovereignty vs. the state of Georgia was publicly ridiculed by Jackson, who refused to enforce it. In 1830 Jackson finally got Congress to Pass the Removal Act, which authorized him to use the army to totally relocate or exterminate all Indians east of the Mississippi River. The whole Eastern half of this continent was now to be completely cleared of Indians, every square inch given over to the needs of European settlers. In magnitude this was as sweeping as Hitler's grand design to render continental Europe "free" of Jews. Under Jackson's direction, the U.S. Army committed genocide on an impressive scale. The Cherokee Nation, for instance, was dismantled, with one-third of the Cherokee population dying in the Winter of 1838 (from disease, famine, exposure and gunfire as the U.S. Army marched them away at bayonet point on "The Trail of Tears").(11)
First as a land speculator, then as slavemaster, and finally as General and then President, Jackson literally spent the whole of his adult life personally involved in genocide. During the Creek War of 1813-14 Jackson and his fellow frontiersmen slaughtered hundreds of unarmed women and children - afterwards skinning the bodies to make souvenirs.(12) [ While some of Hitler's Death Camp officers are said to have made lampshades out of the skins of murdered Jews, the practicalities of frontier life led Jackson and his men to make bridle reins out of their victim's skins.] Naturally, Jackson had a vicious hatred of Indians and Afrikans. He spent the majority of his years in public office pressing military campaigns against the Seminole in Florida, who had earned special enmity by sheltering escaped Afrikans. U.S. military campaigns in Florida against first the Spanish and then the Seminole, were in large part motivated by the need to eliminate this land base for independent Afrikan regroupment.
Time and again Jackson made it clear that he favored a "Final Solution" of total genocide for all Indians. In his second State of the Union Address, Jackson reassured his fellow settlers that they should not feel guilty when they "tread on the graves of extinct nations", since the wiping out of all Indian life was just as "natural" as the passing of generations! Could anyone miss the point? After years and decades soaked in aggression and killing, could any Euro-Amerikan not know what Jackson stood for? Yet he was the chosen hero of the Euro-Amerikan workers of that day.
While Hitler never won an election in his life - and had to use the armed power of the state to violently crush the German workers and their organizations - Jackson was swept into power by the votes of Euro-Amerikan workmen and small farmers. His jingoistic expansionism was popular with all sectors of settler society, in particular with those who planned to use Indian land to help solve settler economic troubles. Northern workers praised him for his opposition to the old colonial elite of the Federalist Party, his stand on the National Bank, and his famous "Equal Protection Doctrine". The later piously declaimed that government's duty was not to favor the rich, but through taxation and other measures to give aid "alike on the high and low, the rich and the poor..." of settler society.(15)
Jackson was the historic founder of today's Democratic Party; not only in organization, but in first welding together the electoral coalition of Southern planters and Northern "ethnic" workers. He was the first President to claim that he was born in a log cabin, of lowly circumstances. This "redneck" posture, enhanced by his bloody military adventures, was very popular with the mass of small slave-owners in his native South - and with Northern workers as well! Detailed voting studies confirm that in both the 1828 and 1832 elections, Jackson received the overwhelming majority of the votes of immigrant Irish and German workers in the North.(16) White workmen joined his Democratic Party as a new crusade for equality among settlers.
The dominant political slogan of the white workers movement of the 1840's was "Vote Yourself A Farm". This expressed the widespread view that it was each settler's right to have cheap land to farm, and that the ideal lifestyle was the old colonial-era model of the self-employed craftsmen who also possessed the security of being part-time farmers. The white labor movement, most particularly the influential newspaper, Working Man's Advocate of New York, called for new legislation under which the Empire would guarantee cheap tracts of Indian and Mexican land to all European settlers (and impoverished workmen in particular).(19) [ The Homestead Act of 1851 was one result of this campaign.] The white workers literally demanded their traditional settler right to be petit-bourgeois-"little bourgeois", petty imitators who would annex their small, individual plots each time the real bourgeoisie annexed another oppressed nation. It should be clear that the backwardness of white labor is not a matter of "racism", of "mistaken ideas", of "being tricked by the capitalists" (all idealistic instead of materialist formulations); rather, it is a class question and a national question.
This stratum came into being with its feet on top of the proletariat and its head straining up into the petit-bourgeoisie. It's startling how narrow and petty its concerns were in an age when the destiny of peoples and nations was being decided, when the settler Empire was trying to take into its hands the power to decree death to whole nations. We keep coming back to genocide, the inescapable center of settler politics in the 19th Century. So to fully grasp the politics of emerging white labor, we must penetrate to the connection between their class viewpoint and genocide.
Как, сука, точно описано, что такое либерал.
This stratum came into being with its feet on top of the proletariat and its head straining up into the petit-bourgeoisie. It's startling how narrow and petty its concerns were in an age when the destiny of peoples and nations was being decided, when the settler Empire was trying to take into its hands the power to decree death to whole nations. We keep coming back to genocide, the inescapable center of settler politics in the 19th Century. So to fully grasp the politics of emerging white labor, we must penetrate to the connection between their class viewpoint and genocide.
Как, сука, точно описано, что такое либерал.
http://readsettlers.org
Короче, читайте, товарищи. Белый пролетарий США - не наш брат. Как было многократно доказано полной импотентностью коммунистического движения в США, основанного на профсоюзах белых - и удивительной успешностью (пока их не начинают бомбить полицаи в связке с белыми левыми) чёрного сопротивления.
>постановления после суда и следствия
>Тройки
Ой пиздло, ой пиздло. Сталинские тройки нарушали конституцию, т.к. были несудебными органами. "Тройки НКВД СССР осуществляли свою деятельность в составе руководителя управления НКВД СССР по республике (крае, области), секретаря обкома ВКП(б) и прокурора республики (края, области)".
Лучше бы нашел хоть один случай в истории когда гомунисты не обосрались и построили гомунизм.
>Yet Karl Marx observed
Что плохого в геноциде и рабстве?
Хочешь спокойно жить в своей стране, без диких понаехов - нацист, фашист. Окей, коммипадаль, полезай в газенваген.
Миллиарды расстреляных лично Рузвельтом, ясн.
[Similar arguments relative to today are advanced by the "Don't-Divide-The-Working-Class" revisionists, who want to convince us that the Euro-Amerikan masses are "victims of imperialism" just like us]
Yet Karl Marx observed: "Cause slavery to disappear and you will have wiped America off the map of nations."(15) Marx was writing during the zenith of the cotton economy of the mid-1800s, but this most basic fact is true from the bare beginnings of European settlement in Amerika. Without slave labor there would have been no Amerika. It is as simple as that. Long before the cotton economy of the South flourished, for example, Afrikan slaves literally built the City of New York. Their work alone enabled the original Dutch settlers to be fed and sheltered while pursuing their drinking, gambling, furtrading and other non-laboring activities. Afrikans were not only much of early New York's farmers, carpenters, and blacksmiths, but also comprised much of the City's guards.
The Dutch settlers were so dependent on Afrikan labor for the basics of life that their Governor finally had to grant some Afrikan slaves both freedom and land in return for their continued food production. The Afrikan-owned land on Manhattan included what is now known as Greenwich Village, Astor Place, and Herald Square. Later, the English settlers would pass laws against Afrikan land ownership, and take these tracts from the free Afrikans. Manhattan was thus twice stolen from oppressed peoples.(16)
Indian slavery was also important in supporting the settler invasion beachhead on the "New World". From New England (where the pious Pilgrims called them "servants") to South Carolina, the forced labor of Indian slaves was essential to the very survival of the young Colonies. In fact, the profits from the Indian slave trade were the economic mainstay of the settler invasion of the Carolinas. In 1708 the English settlements in the Carolinas had a population of 1,400 Indian slaves and 2,900 Afrikan slaves to 5,300 Europeans. Indian slaves were common throughout the Colonies — in 1730 the settlers of Kingston, Rhode Island had 223 Indian slaves (as well as 333 Afrikan slaves). As late in 1740 we know that some 14,000 Indian slaves labored in the plantations of South Carolina.(17)